This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
press ending ">" at this sample code at position of "|" -> table end tag should be reindented according to table startag ---------------- <table> </table| ---------------- Seems that tests has failed on Sunday for the first time
Mila, this regression was caused (I think) by your fix of issue 150875 (integration date matches first failure of our unit tests). The problem is that HtmlKit$HtmlDefaultKeyTypedAction (and consequently HtmlKeystrokeHandler) stopped being called. A thread dump from week or two old build looked like: at org.netbeans.modules.html.editor.gsf.HtmlKeystrokeHandler.afterCharInserted(HtmlKeystrokeHandler.java:82) at org.netbeans.modules.html.editor.HtmlKit$HtmlDefaultKeyTypedAction.insertString(HtmlKit.java:281) at org.netbeans.editor.BaseKit$DefaultKeyTypedAction$1.run(BaseKit.java:1113) at org.netbeans.editor.GuardedDocument.runAtomicAsUser(GuardedDocument.java:354) at org.netbeans.editor.BaseKit$DefaultKeyTypedAction.actionPerformed(BaseKit.java:1084) at org.netbeans.editor.ext.ExtKit$ExtDefaultKeyTypedAction.actionPerformed(ExtKit.java:1016) at org.netbeans.modules.html.editor.HtmlKit$HtmlDefaultKeyTypedAction.actionPerformed(HtmlKit.java:252) at org.netbeans.editor.BaseAction.actionPerformed(BaseAction.java:297) at javax.swing.SwingUtilities.notifyAction(SwingUtilities.java:1636) in lastest build it is just: at org.netbeans.editor.BaseKit$DefaultKeyTypedAction.actionPerformed(BaseKit.java:974) at org.netbeans.editor.ext.ExtKit$ExtDefaultKeyTypedAction.actionPerformed(ExtKit.java:1033) at org.netbeans.editor.BaseAction.actionPerformed(BaseAction.java:325) at org.openide.awt.AlwaysEnabledAction.actionPerformed(AlwaysEnabledAction.java:118) at javax.swing.SwingUtilities.notifyAction(SwingUtilities.java:1636) Is there something what needs to be fixed on our side?
This should be fixed as part of issue 162565. *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 162565 ***
v.