This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 206878

Summary:	LowPerformance took 55001 ms.
Product:	javame	Reporter:	Exceptions Reporter <exceptions_reporter>
Component:	Visual Designer	Assignee:	Roman Svitanic <rsvitanic>
Status:	NEW ---
Severity:	normal	CC:	alied, himesh, janario, maito, Melanio, sudhir65
Priority:	P3	Keywords:	PERFORMANCE
Version:	7.1.2
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Windows 7 x64
Issue Type:	DEFECT	Exception Reporter:	170148
Attachments:	nps snapshot

Description Exceptions Reporter 2012-01-03 16:59:51 UTC

Build: NetBeans IDE 7.0.1 (Build 201107282000)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 14.2-b01, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_16-b01
OS: Windows 7

User Comments:
GUEST: I was editing flow in my MIDP application.



Maximum slowness yet reported was 55001 ms, average is 16697

Comment 1 Exceptions Reporter 2012-01-03 17:00:18 UTC

Created attachment 114589 [details]
nps snapshot

Comment 2 Dusan Balek 2012-01-05 14:28:26 UTC

As can be seen from the attached snapshot, a single call to org.netbeans.modules.vmd.api.codegen.JavaCodeGenerator.generateCodeCore(...) results in 510 calls to org.netbeans.modules.editor.indent.api.Reformat.reformat(...).

JavaCodeGenerator should be modified to use the new Editor Indentation and Reformatting API instead of old IndentEngines.

Comment 3 Anton Chechel 2012-02-24 10:48:19 UTC

*** Bug 207034 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Dusan Balek 2012-04-25 13:37:29 UTC

*** Bug 211711 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Dusan Balek 2012-04-25 14:05:41 UTC

*** Bug 211712 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Dusan Balek 2012-08-13 10:04:45 UTC

*** Bug 215204 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Dusan Balek 2012-08-13 10:36:38 UTC

*** Bug 215183 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 David Strupl 2013-04-09 11:22:59 UTC

Assigning to the new owner of javame modules.

Comment 9 Dusan Balek 2015-03-04 13:31:45 UTC

*** Bug 249509 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***