This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 82559 - PackageView and META-INF
Summary: PackageView and META-INF
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: java
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jan Jancura
URL:
Keywords:
: 62288 151900 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-08-12 00:12 UTC by Rochelle Raccah
Modified: 2009-10-21 00:55 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rochelle Raccah 2006-08-12 00:12:07 UTC 
This is in a JavaSE project using Java Persistence, so there's a META-INF dir.

The node for this dir shows under Source Packages in the explorer - good.
This dir shows up when using the Package combo (PackageView) in NFT templates,
but if the user chooses it, there's a message that it's invalid.  Can't it just
be excluded from the combo?  It might depend on what NFT item you choose, but it
seems silly for it to be populated with an invalid value.
Comment 1 Lukas Hasik 2008-04-10 21:36:46 UTC 
moving opened issues from TM <= 6.1 to TM=Dev
Comment 2 Jesse Glick 2008-10-30 21:53:18 UTC 
*** Issue 62288 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 3 Jesse Glick 2008-10-30 21:53:26 UTC 
*** Issue 151900 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 4 Jesse Glick 2008-10-30 21:54:45 UTC 
In the case of NBM projects, will be less of an issue in the future due to issue #150447: src/META-INF/services/ will
not exist normally. But still an issue for general project types.
Comment 5 Jesse Glick 2009-10-20 17:11:03 UTC 
Not worth the effort to fix, I think.
Comment 6 Rochelle Raccah 2009-10-21 00:55:59 UTC 
Up to you, I guess, but there are a bunch of duplicates (one of the dups listed here has its own dups), so I think this
has been confusing for several folks.