This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 68353 - StackOverflowException on opening project
Summary: StackOverflowException on opening project
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 66404
Alias: None
Product: apisupport
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Martin Krauskopf
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-11-09 10:45 UTC by pzajac
Modified: 2005-11-16 13:22 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
exception (10.69 KB, text/plain)
2005-11-09 10:47 UTC, pzajac 		Details
used netbeans_module_project.zip (5.22 KB, application/x-compressed)
2005-11-09 10:48 UTC, pzajac 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description pzajac 2005-11-09 10:45:54 UTC 
[200511081900]
I tried to open project created in older dev build.  

java.lang.StackOverflowError
	at
org.netbeans.modules.apisupport.project.NbModuleProject$4.delegatingEvaluator(NbModuleProject.java:484)
	at
org.netbeans.modules.apisupport.project.NbModuleProject$4.evaluate(NbModuleProject.java:508)
Comment 1 pzajac 2005-11-09 10:47:01 UTC 
Created attachment 26741 [details]
exception
Comment 2 pzajac 2005-11-09 10:48:37 UTC 
Created attachment 26742 [details]
used netbeans_module_project.zip
Comment 3 Martin Krauskopf 2005-11-09 10:56:22 UTC 
Corrupted metadata. Just delete nbproject/private. Dupe.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 66404 ***
Comment 4 Geertjan Wielenga 2005-11-09 13:44:50 UTC 
I got this problem after I deleted the nbproject/private folder.
Comment 5 Martin Krauskopf 2005-11-09 13:50:15 UTC 
Maybe also build-impl.xml and genfiles.properties. This is what I did with the
attached module and it works then. But definitely a bug. Let's continue
discussion in the issue 66404. (already hotfix attached there - but leaving on
Jesse the solution - his code - could be sensitive).
Comment 6 pzajac 2005-11-16 13:22:01 UTC 
verified