This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 66480 - failure in testRemoveModuleFromSuite
Summary: failure in testRemoveModuleFromSuite
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 67314
Alias: None
Product: apisupport
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: Sun Solaris
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Martin Krauskopf
URL:
Keywords: RANDOM, TEST
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-10-11 13:55 UTC by pzajac
Modified: 2005-11-01 14:03 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
log (6.77 KB, text/html)
2005-10-11 13:56 UTC, pzajac 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description pzajac 2005-10-11 13:55:42 UTC 
Test Suite org.netbeans.modules.apisupport.project.ui.customizer.SuiteUtilsTest

Operating System Name	:	SunOS
Operating System Version	:	5.9
System Architecture	:	sparc
Java Version	:	1.5.0_02
Java Vendor	:	Sun Microsystems Inc.
User Language	:	cs
Comment 1 pzajac 2005-10-11 13:56:09 UTC 
Created attachment 25801 [details]
log
Comment 2 Martin Krauskopf 2005-10-19 01:54:18 UTC 
Yup, I'll take a look at it as soon as I establish some account on Sol as you
instructed me yesterday ;) However quite strange that those test don't pass only
on Solaris.
Comment 3 Martin Krauskopf 2005-10-20 16:27:03 UTC 
Fighting with this on remote machine. JDK 1.4.x seems to work ok.
Comment 4 Martin Krauskopf 2005-10-21 13:29:30 UTC 
Culprit seems to be in suite's evaluator. It doesn't return actual values when
project.properties is changed. But it's heavily RANDOM so far. No idea what
could be wrong. Having test, forcing it to fail, maybe not apisupport/project
bug.... 

66487 is presuamble actually a dupe of this one - the same problem.
Comment 5 Martin Krauskopf 2005-10-21 16:51:00 UTC 
Filed new more detailed issue 67314.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 67314 ***
Comment 6 pzajac 2005-11-01 14:03:09 UTC 
v