This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 66094 - Huge regression on complex startup
Summary: Huge regression on complex startup
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: ide
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Performance (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: All All
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: _ rkubacki
URL:
Keywords: PERFORMANCE
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-10-06 09:38 UTC by Marian Mirilovic
Modified: 2011-05-25 11:37 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marian Mirilovic 2005-10-06 09:38:37 UTC 
Complex startup regression :

NB 5.0 (200510052037)
Lin   +22.4  % 	
JDS   +25.1  % 	
Sol9  +35.8  % 	
Sol10 +35.1  % 	
Win2K +18.9  %

previous build (continual from the morning of the same day)
NB 5.0 (200510050715)
Lin   -0.8  %
JDS   -4.8  %
Sol9  +0.2  %
Sol10 -4.5  %
Win2K +2.2  %
Comment 1 _ rkubacki 2005-10-06 09:52:41 UTC 
I tried to verify on my Solaris machine and can't confirm it - build
200510031800 is even slightly worse than 200510052037

52.8 52.0 51.2
vs. 
50.4 50.5 50.7

So I am not sure what is wrong
Comment 2 _ rkubacki 2005-10-07 12:31:44 UTC 
I tried automated test on various continous builds from Oct 5 and the regression
appeared between 20051005-0426 & 20051005-1040. The most suspicious integration
seems to be -

2005-10-05 09:44  jbecicka

	*
	 #61909: cannot set main class form libraries in the project
	cutomizer's run panel
	java/javacore/src/org/netbeans/modules/javacore/jmiimpl/javamodel/R
	esourceImpl.java:

also there is newer one from Tomas Hurka - 
revision 1.105
date: 2005/10/07 08:21:02;  author: thurka;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -1
getStatus() can invoke parsing for java files - getName() is better


that suggests it can be fixed now. Honzo, Tome any comments to this? I will
check next build to verify if that's it.
Comment 3 Jan Becicka 2005-10-07 12:52:47 UTC 
This regression should be fixed by Tomas, I hope.
Comment 4 _ rkubacki 2005-10-07 13:06:31 UTC 
thanks
Comment 5 Tomas Hurka 2005-10-07 13:10:16 UTC 
Yes, this is fixed by
Checking in ResourceImpl.java;
/cvs/java/javacore/src/org/netbeans/modules/javacore/jmiimpl/javamodel/ResourceImpl.java,v
 <--  ResourceImpl.java
new revision: 1.105; previous revision: 1.104
done
Comment 6 Marian Mirilovic 2005-10-12 15:20:24 UTC 
verified in NB5.0(200510111800)