This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 56598 - Multi view button titles display as '...' on JDK 1.6
Summary: Multi view button titles display as '...' on JDK 1.6
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Window System (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Milos Kleint
URL: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_...
Keywords: JDK_SPECIFIC
: 58346 64383 65313 66901 68177 69237 70014 71238 71755 72772 85261 86430 87431 87469 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-03-17 12:59 UTC by Jan Chalupa
Modified: 2011-06-09 09:51 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
zipped java project showing the error. (9.66 KB, application/x-compressed)
2005-11-11 09:23 UTC, Milos Kleint 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jan Chalupa 2005-03-17 12:59:16 UTC 
[custom build of 2005-03-16 sources, JDK 1.6 b24 and 27]

Open a form in NetBeans. Look at the Source and Design multi-view buttons. '...'
is displayed instead of the real button titles.

Not sure if this is a NetBeans or JDK issue. Milos, please investigate.
Comment 1 Milos Kleint 2005-03-22 09:58:49 UTC 
it could be related to #51404 but that one is macOS related.
it doesn't happen in 1.4/1.5
Comment 2 Milos Kleint 2005-03-30 13:15:08 UTC 
happens in winxp L&F only, also with build 29
Comment 3 Milos Kleint 2005-04-29 14:51:30 UTC 
*** Issue 58346 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 4 Milos Kleint 2005-09-16 08:55:19 UTC 
*** Issue 64383 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 5 Milos Kleint 2005-10-05 16:40:11 UTC 
*** Issue 65313 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 6 Jan Stola 2005-10-17 09:21:54 UTC 
*** Issue 66901 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 7 Jan Stola 2005-11-07 10:14:06 UTC 
*** Issue 68177 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 8 _ alexlamsl 2005-11-07 10:59:07 UTC 
since the problem persists for build 58:

1) is there a relevant JDK issue submitted?

2) can there be any (simple) workaround if possible?
Comment 9 Milos Kleint 2005-11-11 09:22:52 UTC 
seems to b a bug in jdk, attaching a simple swing project that shows the error.
Comment 10 Milos Kleint 2005-11-11 09:23:39 UTC 
Created attachment 26852 [details]
zipped java project showing the error.
Comment 11 Milos Kleint 2005-11-11 09:53:27 UTC 
filed issue against mustang - 6349010
Comment 12 Milos Kleint 2005-11-16 13:23:21 UTC 
bug was accepted by jdk team, closing this issue as wontfix.
Comment 13 Milos Kleint 2005-11-25 07:06:06 UTC 
*** Issue 69237 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 14 Tomas Pavek 2005-12-07 13:13:44 UTC 
*** Issue 70014 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 15 Marian Mirilovic 2006-01-10 16:17:11 UTC 
*** Issue 71238 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 16 dbauer 2006-01-10 16:25:24 UTC 
If this is specific to JDK 1.6, then why doesn't this problem occur under 
Linux, which is also running JDK 1.6?
Comment 17 Marian Mirilovic 2006-01-10 16:48:35 UTC 
dbauer,
what is the build number of your JDK 6.0, when you are not able to reproduce the
problem?
Comment 18 Jan Chalupa 2006-01-10 17:18:21 UTC 
Re "why doesn't this problem occur under Linux, which is also running JDK 1.6?".

Because the component sizes are computed from metrics that are L&F Specific. For
details, see

http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6349010
Comment 19 Milan Kubec 2006-01-24 09:31:55 UTC 
*** Issue 71755 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 20 Jan Stola 2006-02-17 14:00:34 UTC 
*** Issue 72772 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 21 Jiri Prox 2006-09-20 08:50:51 UTC 
*** Issue 85261 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 22 Milos Kleint 2006-10-04 07:54:57 UTC 
*** Issue 86430 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 23 Jan Stola 2007-01-08 08:59:55 UTC 
*** Issue 87431 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 24 Jan Stola 2007-01-08 09:33:15 UTC 
*** Issue 87469 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 25 Marian Mirilovic 2011-06-09 09:51:25 UTC 
v/c