This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 54768 - Wrong order of file templates and categories
Summary: Wrong order of file templates and categories
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: javaee
Classification: Unclassified
Component: EJB Project (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Andrei Badea
URL: http://j2ee.netbeans.org/nonav/docs/e...
Keywords: UI
Depends on: 54841
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2005-02-09 18:14 UTC by jrojcek
Modified: 2006-03-24 13:09 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description jrojcek 2005-02-09 18:14:04 UTC 
The correct order is in the UI spec in the URL field.
Comment 1 Andrei Badea 2005-02-10 18:00:13 UTC 
I noticed the spec doesn't mention JUnit tests. Isnt't this a bug?
Comment 2 jrojcek 2005-02-14 16:44:53 UTC 
It is missing in the spec (not intentionally ;-). I will update the spec with this order of 
categories:

Enterprise
  Session Bean
  Entity Bean
  Entity Beans from Database
  Message-Driven Bean
  Service Locator
  Caching Service Locator
Java Classes
JavaBeans Objects
JUnit
Web Services
...
Comment 3 Andrei Badea 2005-02-21 08:39:54 UTC 
Added the JUnit category:

Checking in EjbJarProject.java;
/cvs/j2ee/ejbjarproject/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/ejbjarproject/EjbJarProject.java,v
 <--  EjbJarProject.java
new revision: 1.32; previous revision: 1.31
done
Comment 4 Andrei Badea 2005-04-02 14:53:02 UTC 
Made the session bean template be the first in the Enterprise category.

Checking in layer.xml;
/cvs/j2ee/ejbjarproject/src/org/netbeans/modules/j2ee/ejbjarproject/ui/resources/layer.xml,v
 <--  layer.xml
new revision: 1.16; previous revision: 1.15
done
Comment 5 Andrei Badea 2005-04-02 14:53:37 UTC 
AFAICT the order is now correct. Marking as fixed.
Comment 6 L Martinek 2005-07-15 12:08:02 UTC 
verified