This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 230698 - IllegalArgumentException: Comparison method violates its general contract!
Summary: IllegalArgumentException: Comparison method violates its general contract!
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 226100
Alias: None
Product: projects
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Maven (show other bugs)
Version: 7.3
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Milos Kleint
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-06-03 21:19 UTC by Exceptions Reporter
Modified: 2013-06-04 05:12 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 201144

Attachments
stacktrace (1.10 KB, text/plain)
2013-06-03 21:19 UTC, Exceptions Reporter 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Exceptions Reporter 2013-06-03 21:19:43 UTC 
This bug was originally marked as duplicate of bug 222286, that is already resolved. This bug is still valid, so this seems to be another bug, but it might be related.

Build: NetBeans IDE 7.3 (Build 201302132200)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 23.7-b01, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.7.0_13-b20
OS: Windows 8

User Comments:
GUEST: .




Stacktrace: 
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Comparison method violates its general contract!
   at java.util.ComparableTimSort.mergeLo(ComparableTimSort.java:714)
   at java.util.ComparableTimSort.mergeAt(ComparableTimSort.java:451)
   at java.util.ComparableTimSort.mergeCollapse(ComparableTimSort.java:376)
   at java.util.ComparableTimSort.sort(ComparableTimSort.java:182)
   at java.util.ComparableTimSort.sort(ComparableTimSort.java:146)
   at java.util.Arrays.sort(Arrays.java:472)
Comment 1 Exceptions Reporter 2013-06-03 21:19:45 UTC 
Created attachment 135293 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Milos Kleint 2013-06-04 05:12:27 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 226100 ***