This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Build: NetBeans IDE 7.3 Beta (Build 201209201306) VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 23.3-b01, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.7.0_07-b10 OS: Linux User Comments: vriha: creating a new file in Easel Demo Stacktrace: java.lang.AssertionError at org.netbeans.modules.web.clientproject.util.ClientSideProjectUtilities.getSourceGroups(ClientSideProjectUtilities.java:173) at org.netbeans.modules.web.clientproject.ui.wizard.NewFileWizardIterator.getSourceGroups(NewFileWizardIterator.java:172) at org.netbeans.modules.web.clientproject.ui.wizard.NewFileWizardIterator.getPanels(NewFileWizardIterator.java:163) at org.netbeans.modules.web.clientproject.ui.wizard.NewFileWizardIterator.initialize(NewFileWizardIterator.java:83) at org.openide.loaders.TemplateWizard$InstantiatingIteratorBridge.initialize(TemplateWizard.java:1028) at org.openide.loaders.TemplateWizardIterImpl.setIterator(TemplateWizardIterImpl.java:104)
Created attachment 124681 [details] stacktrace
I'm unable to reproduce it, the steps were: - create a new project with sources from Easel Demo - resolve problems with test and config folders (I created them inside site root, no other choice there) - try to create a new HTML file in test folder or under site root Happens with testing demo for J1 => P1, please evaluate
Weird, the project was not the ClientSideProject. I will improve the assertion. Davide, do you have any idea what could happen? Perhaps a lazy project?
Assertion improved. http://hg.netbeans.org/web-main/rev/7d4a51cf49ab I suggest to close this issue as WORKSFORME - not good but no idea how to reproduce and how it could happen, sorry. Thanks.
(In reply to comment #4) > Assertion improved. > > http://hg.netbeans.org/web-main/rev/7d4a51cf49ab > > I suggest to close this issue as WORKSFORME - not good but no idea how to > reproduce and how it could happen, sorry. > > Thanks. fine with me since it seems to be one time problem
It is not reproducible, right? So adding RANDOM keyword.
yes, it is not reproducible and I have seen it only once. I would suggest to remove stopper and lower priority. What do you think?
(In reply to comment #7) > yes, it is not reproducible and I have seen it only once. I would suggest to > remove stopper and lower priority. What do you think? Agreed ... Tomas, could you please backport the change you've done, so we will get better logging from Beta as it is expected to be used by broader audience. Thanks in advance.
(In reply to comment #8) > Agreed ... Tomas, could you please backport the change you've done, so we will > get better logging from Beta as it is expected to be used by broader audience. > Thanks in advance. Done. http://hg.netbeans.org/releases/rev/ff53808ac271
Tomasi, please close this one as WORKSFORME ... so if ER will catch a duplicate, it will reopen this one with additional information. Thanks in advance.
Done.
(In reply to comment #3) > Davide, do you have any idea what could happen? Perhaps a lazy project? Looks like something Lazy. We will see with your new logging. Thanks.