This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 210273 - Maven OSGi: method does not override or implement a method from a supertype
Summary: Maven OSGi: method does not override or implement a method from a supertype
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Alias: None
Product: projects
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Maven (show other bugs)
Version: 7.1
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 normal (vote)
Assignee: Milos Kleint
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-03-28 12:51 UTC by puce
Modified: 2012-03-29 08:36 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description puce 2012-03-28 12:51:29 UTC 
The Projects view and the Java editor show an error (method does not override or implement a method from a supertype) though a clean & build works fine.

This is very annoying!

- Maven 3 with maven-bundle-plugin
- Java SE 7
- NetBeans 7.1
Comment 1 Milos Kleint 2012-03-28 13:10:52 UTC 
please create a sample project demonstrating the problem. Is it always reproducible, even with a clean userdirectory?
Comment 2 puce 2012-03-28 13:42:30 UTC 
I recently had to delete the whole user directory lately (because of issue #209628), and as far as I remember the Maven OSGi issues appeared before and after. Sometimes the IDE shows no errors, sometimes it shows some errors though there is none (clean & build works).
Comment 3 Milos Kleint 2012-03-28 16:27:12 UTC 
please DO submit a sample project. It is not appearing for me when I try with a sample java project. Co your project configuration could be part of the problem.
Comment 4 Milos Kleint 2012-03-29 08:36:35 UTC 
Tomas, Jan: anything rings a bell? I couldn't find an existing duplicate of this issue in maven bugs, maybe you have some in java support?\

The one looks closely related to issue 210271, maybe just another visualization of the same problem?