This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 198945 - No highlighting and auto (un)commenting (CTRL / -> #) for .htaccess files
Summary: No highlighting and auto (un)commenting (CTRL / -> #) for .htaccess files
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 166364
Alias: None
Product: php
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Editor (show other bugs)
Version: 7.0
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Petr Pisl
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-05-27 10:11 UTC by JanGen
Modified: 2011-10-06 14:34 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description JanGen 2011-05-27 10:11:12 UTC 
Product Version = NetBeans IDE 7.0 (Build 201104080000)
Operating System = Linux version 2.6.35-28-generic running on amd64
Java; VM; Vendor = 1.6.0_24
Runtime = Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 19.1-b02
Comment 1 Leonid Lenyashin 2011-05-27 13:12:33 UTC 
I'm not sure I understand why it is cnd and sh.
.htaccess is Apache access control file and it is more xml-like rather then .sh like.
Comment 2 Alexander Simon 2011-09-08 07:50:31 UTC 
Not CND issue, reassign to evaluation
Comment 3 Marek Fukala 2011-09-12 14:21:09 UTC 
it has nothing to do with web category. reassigning back. OTOH is it really a bug? Has there ever been a support for it?
Comment 4 Petr Jiricka 2011-10-06 07:34:06 UTC 
I think PHP is the most appropriate category (as this file is mostly used in PHP projects. Marek is right that this is an enhancement request, not a defect.
Comment 5 Petr Pisl 2011-10-06 09:02:22 UTC 
To provide this means to implement whole support for these files (data object, lexer etc. )
Comment 6 kAlvaro 2011-10-06 10:08:43 UTC 
Is this a dupe of #166364 "Code coloring for .htaccess files"?
Comment 7 Petr Pisl 2011-10-06 14:34:59 UTC 
@kAlvaro: yes, you are absolutely right. Thanks for this.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 166364 ***