This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
This bug was originally marked as duplicate of bug 191620, that is already resolved. This bug is still valid, so this seems to be another bug, but it might be related. Build: NetBeans IDE 7.0 RC1 (Build 201103100000) VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 19.1-b02, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_24-b07 OS: Windows XP User Comments: alied: after weird autocompletion [1] [1]http://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196614 Stacktrace: java.lang.IllegalStateException: matchOffset=30891 > docViewEndOffset=30890 docView: DV@0127b4a5#83:<26700,30890>, WxH:904.0x1411.0; incomingMod=true; lengthyAtomicEdit=0 [ 0]: PV@0189f2a6#11:<26700,26738> Y=0.0(R0.0), WxH:304.0x17.0 [ 0]: HV@01c4d9f3#0:<26700,26704> X=0.0(R0.0) L=[0#5]<0>;x=0.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL> [ 1]: HV@00c1109d#0:<26704,26710> X=32.0(R32.0) L=[1#5]<4>;x=32.0;fC=RGB[0;0;230];bC=<NULL> [ 2]: HV@0129c74b#0:<26710,26711> X=80.0(R80.0) L=[2#5]<10>;x=80.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL> [ 3]: HV@01db3480#0:<26711,26717> X=88.0(R88.0) L=[3#5]<11>;x=88.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL> [ 4]: HV@0053f9e5#0:<26717,26718> X=136.0(R136.0) L=[4#5]<17>;x=136.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL> ... [ 6]: HV@013b61f9#0:<26733,26734> X=264.0(R264.0) L=[0#4]<0>;x=0.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL> [ 7]: HV@019d4905#0:<26734,26735> X=272.0(R272.0) L=[1#4]<1>;x=8.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL> [ 8]: HV@0124fb94#0:<26735,26736> X=280.0(R280.0) L=[2#4]<2>;x=16.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL> [ at org.netbeans.modules.editor.lib2.view.ViewBuilder.createNextView(ViewBuilder.java:389) at org.netbeans.modules.editor.lib2.view.ViewBuilder.createViews(ViewBuilder.java:343) at org.netbeans.modules.editor.lib2.view.ViewUpdates.buildViews(ViewUpdates.java:180) at org.netbeans.modules.editor.lib2.view.ViewUpdates.insertUpdate(ViewUpdates.java:367) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor331.invoke(GeneratedMethodAccessor331.java:0) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
Created attachment 106923 [details] stacktrace
*** Bug 196616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 196549 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Mila, regression ?
Milo, I am confused by the relationship of this bug with 196549. Seems like your intention was to close this one as duplicate of 196549. Which seems to make sense to me. Could you please close this issue if this is the case? Thanks
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 196549 ***
Yes, exactly. I was a bit surprised that simple closing as dup succeeded since it actually creates a cycle Adup-ofB and Bdup-ofA.
duplicate -> Verified.