This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 196615 - [70cat] IllegalStateException: matchOffset=30891 > docViewEndOffset=30890 docView: DV@0127b4a5#83:<26700,30890>, WxH:904.0x1411.0; incomingMod=true; lengthyAtomicEdit=0 [ 0]: PV@0189f2a6#11:<26700,26738>
Summary: [70cat] IllegalStateException: matchOffset=30891 > docViewEndOffset=30890 doc...
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 196549
Alias: None
Product: editor
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Painting & Printing (show other bugs)
Version: 7.0
Hardware: All All
: P1 normal (vote)
Assignee: Miloslav Metelka
URL:
Keywords:
: 196616 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-03-12 06:39 UTC by alied
Modified: 2011-03-16 13:51 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 177496


Attachments
stacktrace (4.81 KB, text/plain)
2011-03-12 06:39 UTC, alied
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description alied 2011-03-12 06:39:10 UTC
This bug was originally marked as duplicate of bug 191620, that is already resolved. This bug is still valid, so this seems to be another bug, but it might be related.

Build: NetBeans IDE 7.0 RC1 (Build 201103100000)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 19.1-b02, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_24-b07
OS: Windows XP

User Comments:
alied: after weird autocompletion [1]
[1]http://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196614




Stacktrace: 
java.lang.IllegalStateException: matchOffset=30891 > docViewEndOffset=30890
docView:
DV@0127b4a5#83:<26700,30890>, WxH:904.0x1411.0; incomingMod=true; lengthyAtomicEdit=0
    [ 0]: PV@0189f2a6#11:<26700,26738> Y=0.0(R0.0), WxH:304.0x17.0
        [ 0]: HV@01c4d9f3#0:<26700,26704> X=0.0(R0.0) L=[0#5]<0>;x=0.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL>
        [ 1]: HV@00c1109d#0:<26704,26710> X=32.0(R32.0) L=[1#5]<4>;x=32.0;fC=RGB[0;0;230];bC=<NULL>
        [ 2]: HV@0129c74b#0:<26710,26711> X=80.0(R80.0) L=[2#5]<10>;x=80.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL>
        [ 3]: HV@01db3480#0:<26711,26717> X=88.0(R88.0) L=[3#5]<11>;x=88.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL>
        [ 4]: HV@0053f9e5#0:<26717,26718> X=136.0(R136.0) L=[4#5]<17>;x=136.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL>
        ...
        [ 6]: HV@013b61f9#0:<26733,26734> X=264.0(R264.0) L=[0#4]<0>;x=0.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL>
        [ 7]: HV@019d4905#0:<26734,26735> X=272.0(R272.0) L=[1#4]<1>;x=8.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL>
        [ 8]: HV@0124fb94#0:<26735,26736> X=280.0(R280.0) L=[2#4]<2>;x=16.0;fC=<NULL>;bC=<NULL>
        [
   at org.netbeans.modules.editor.lib2.view.ViewBuilder.createNextView(ViewBuilder.java:389)
   at org.netbeans.modules.editor.lib2.view.ViewBuilder.createViews(ViewBuilder.java:343)
   at org.netbeans.modules.editor.lib2.view.ViewUpdates.buildViews(ViewUpdates.java:180)
   at org.netbeans.modules.editor.lib2.view.ViewUpdates.insertUpdate(ViewUpdates.java:367)
   at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor331.invoke(GeneratedMethodAccessor331.java:0)
   at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
Comment 1 alied 2011-03-12 06:39:13 UTC
Created attachment 106923 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Marian Mirilovic 2011-03-12 08:52:10 UTC
*** Bug 196616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Marian Mirilovic 2011-03-12 08:52:50 UTC
*** Bug 196549 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Marian Mirilovic 2011-03-12 08:53:58 UTC
Mila, regression ?
Comment 5 Jaromir Uhrik 2011-03-15 11:26:40 UTC
Milo, I am confused by the relationship of this bug with 196549. Seems like your intention was to close this one as duplicate of 196549. Which seems to make sense to me. Could you please close this issue if this is the case? Thanks
Comment 6 Miloslav Metelka 2011-03-15 14:11:42 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 196549 ***
Comment 7 Miloslav Metelka 2011-03-15 14:20:19 UTC
Yes, exactly. I was a bit surprised that simple closing as dup succeeded since it actually creates a cycle Adup-ofB and Bdup-ofA.
Comment 8 Jaromir Uhrik 2011-03-16 09:25:52 UTC
duplicate -> Verified.