This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 190247 - (Maven) transitive dependencies aren't shown
Summary: (Maven) transitive dependencies aren't shown
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: projects
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Maven (show other bugs)
Version: 7.0
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Jesse Glick
URL:
Keywords: REGRESSION
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-09-08 20:26 UTC by athompson
Modified: 2010-11-24 15:31 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description athompson 2010-09-08 20:26:49 UTC
Using the 201009060000 build, Maven 3.0-beta2.

Transitive deps aren't being shown for projects.  Am I missing something?  Did they move?
Comment 1 Jesse Glick 2010-10-15 15:00:29 UTC
I guess I didn't notice that they were displayed in previous releases. Not obvious that it is always wanted to display transitive dependencies; you can still see them if you select Show Dependency Graph.
Comment 2 athompson 2010-10-15 21:11:05 UTC
In the context menu for dependencies, there's a toggle item called "Always show non-classpath dependencies" which doesn't seem to do anything.  Maybe it was supposed to be be the way to turn showing transitive dependencies on and off.
Comment 3 Jesse Glick 2010-10-15 21:49:41 UTC
No, that's for dependencies which do not result in JARs being added to the classpath, e.g. POM dependencies and other oddities.
Comment 4 Jesse Glick 2010-11-01 22:34:04 UTC
core-main #a9fbcfc588a8
Comment 5 Quality Engineering 2010-11-03 03:56:11 UTC
Integrated into 'main-golden', will be available in build *201011030000* on http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/nightly/ (upload may still be in progress)
Changeset: http://hg.netbeans.org/main/rev/a9fbcfc588a8
User: Jesse Glick <jglick@netbeans.org>
Log: #190247: (Maven) transitive dependencies aren't shown
Comment 6 athompson 2010-11-24 15:31:34 UTC
yup