This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 175644 - AssertionError: Invalid start:184929 end:184928
Summary: AssertionError: Invalid start:184929 end:184928
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: web
Classification: Unclassified
Component: YAML (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Ondrej Brejla
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords:
: 183539 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-10-29 12:31 UTC by andyr123
Modified: 2013-07-09 12:54 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 161144


Attachments
stacktrace (2.19 KB, text/plain)
2009-10-29 12:31 UTC, andyr123
Details
stacktrace (2.55 KB, text/plain)
2010-05-21 16:02 UTC, andyr123
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description andyr123 2009-10-29 12:31:17 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build nbms-and-javadoc-4142-on-091022)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 14.1-b02, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_15-b03
OS: Windows XP, 5.1, x86

Stacktrace: 
java.lang.AssertionError: Invalid start:184929 end:184928
        at org.netbeans.modules.csl.api.OffsetRange.<init>(OffsetRange.java:63)
        at org.netbeans.modules.languages.yaml.YamlScanner.addBlocks(YamlScanner.java:133)
        at org.netbeans.modules.languages.yaml.YamlScanner.addBlocks(YamlScanner.java:142)
        at org.netbeans.modules.languages.yaml.YamlScanner.addBlocks(YamlScanner.java:142)
        at org.netbeans.modules.languages.yaml.YamlScanner.folds(YamlScanner.java:116)
        at org.netbeans.modules.csl.editor.fold.GsfFoldManager$JavaElementFoldTask.addTree(GsfFoldManager.java:496)
Comment 1 andyr123 2009-10-29 12:31:39 UTC
Created attachment 90203 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 andyr123 2010-05-21 16:02:14 UTC
Created attachment 99323 [details]
stacktrace

typig in yaml file
Comment 3 Ondrej Brejla 2012-05-04 12:44:15 UTC
*** Bug 183539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Ondrej Brejla 2013-07-09 12:54:33 UTC
Last report is 3 years old, so probably fixed somewhere in infrastructure. And I can't reproduce it either.