This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 169212 - NB 6.7 failed to upgrade Ruby modules.
Summary: NB 6.7 failed to upgrade Ruby modules.
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 175196
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Plugin Manager (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: dlipin
URL:
Keywords:
: 178642 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-07-27 12:26 UTC by Michael Nazarov
Modified: 2009-12-15 05:21 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Nazarov 2009-07-27 12:26:19 UTC
Steps to reproduce:

1. install full NB 6.7
2. edit UC and set http://smetiste.czech.sun.com/builds/netbeans/6.7.1/fcs/latest/uc/catalog.xml.gz
3. accept 2 updates
4. restart IDE
5. accept 26 updates
6. restart IDE

Followed warning will appear:

Warning - could not install some modules:
Ruby and Rails - The module JRuby Parser was requested in version >= 1.1.2 but only 1.1.1.1 was found.
Ruby and Rails - The module Ruby Debugger was requested in version >= 0.104.2 but only 0.104.1 was found.
Comment 1 Yulia Novozhilova 2009-07-27 16:25:11 UTC
I can reproduce the issue only in case if "Features on Demand" is installed. Warning appears. But after IDE is closed
the "update process" proceeds and IDE restarts again without any warnings. So workaround exists and furthermore it is
automated. So, downgrade the issue to P2 and proceed with investigating.
Comment 2 Alexei Mokeev 2009-07-27 17:10:54 UTC
Unable to reproduce it with the above steps under Linux. Is it Windows specific ?
Comment 3 dlipin 2009-07-27 19:34:12 UTC
is it reproducible with official UC (i.e. skip point 2)?
1. install full NB 6.7
2. accept 2 updates
3. restart IDE
4. accept 26 updates
5. restart IDE
Comment 4 dlipin 2009-07-28 10:19:38 UTC
probably the root case is 169293
Comment 5 dlipin 2009-12-09 11:19:12 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 175196 ***
Comment 6 dlipin 2009-12-15 05:21:02 UTC
*** Bug 178642 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***