Please use the Apache issue tracking system for new NetBeans issues ( !!
Bug 152600 - javax.swing.text.BadLocationException: Invalid offset=10444 not within <0, 10395>
javax.swing.text.BadLocationException: Invalid offset=10444 not within <0, 10...
Product: javascript
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Editor
All All
: P2 (vote)
: 6.x
Assigned To: Torbjorn Norbye
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2008-11-07 02:09 UTC by Torbjorn Norbye
Modified: 2009-03-16 16:32 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Torbjorn Norbye 2008-11-07 02:09:09 UTC
javax.swing.text.BadLocationException: Invalid offset=10444 not within <0, 10395>
        at org.netbeans.editor.Utilities.checkOffsetValid(
        at org.netbeans.editor.Utilities.checkOffsetValid(
        at org.netbeans.editor.Utilities.getRowStart(
        at org.netbeans.editor.Utilities.getRowStart(
        at org.netbeans.modules.javascript.editing.JsOccurrenceFinder.highlightExitPoints(
        at org.netbeans.modules.javascript.editing.JsOccurrenceFinder.highlightExitPoints(
        at org.netbeans.modules.javascript.editing.JsOccurrenceFinder.highlightExits(
        at org.netbeans.modules.gsfret.editor.semantic.MarkOccurrencesHighlighter.processImpl(
        at org.netbeans.napi.gsfret.source.Source$
        at java.util.concurrent.Executors$
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$W
Comment 1 Torbjorn Norbye 2008-11-07 02:12:06 UTC
Fixed in changeset 40fc53dbd584.
Comment 2 rbalada 2008-11-13 15:42:35 UTC
Since this issue is P3 priority, in accord with rules "How to include issues into patch"
( it must include an explanation as to why its backport is necessary and how
safe it is.

Could you please provide such explanation?
Comment 3 rbalada 2008-11-14 10:10:52 UTC
Please verify this issue so it can be included in NetBeans 6.5 Patch1
Comment 4 pgebauer 2008-11-24 09:31:08 UTC
The issue didn't pass the nomination process by nomination cut-off date. It has been marked as 65fixes2-candidate.
Comment 5 pgebauer 2009-01-14 09:54:02 UTC
The issue hasn't passed the nomination process for 65patch2 by cut-off date. It has been moved to 65patch3.
Comment 6 Marian Mirilovic 2009-02-19 17:46:29 UTC
100 duplicates -> P2
Comment 7 Martin Schovanek 2009-02-27 08:10:14 UTC
Comment 8 Erno Mononen 2009-03-02 15:52:44 UTC
Transplanted to release65_fixes:

By use of this website, you agree to the NetBeans Policies and Terms of Use. © 2014, Oracle Corporation and/or its affiliates. Sponsored by Oracle logo