This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 133807 - NullPointerException at AutoupdateCheckScheduler.checkUpdateElements
Summary: NullPointerException at AutoupdateCheckScheduler.checkUpdateElements
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 121289
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Autoupdate (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jiri Rechtacek
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-04-23 23:15 UTC by massimo
Modified: 2008-04-25 09:55 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
log (52.36 KB, text/plain)
2008-04-23 23:16 UTC, massimo 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description massimo 2008-04-23 23:15:13 UTC 
Getting this at startup of our branded app. Could you point me to where the problem is? This exception does not give
enough info no how to debug it. I checked URL's and references in layer and Bundle and all seems fine.

SEVERE [org.openide.util.RequestProcessor]
java.lang.NullPointerException
        at
org.netbeans.modules.autoupdate.ui.actions.AutoupdateCheckScheduler.checkUpdateElements(AutoupdateCheckScheduler.java:189)
        at org.netbeans.modules.autoupdate.ui.actions.AutoupdateCheckScheduler.access$300(AutoupdateCheckScheduler.java:77)
        at org.netbeans.modules.autoupdate.ui.actions.AutoupdateCheckScheduler$4.run(AutoupdateCheckScheduler.java:148)
        at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$Task.run(RequestProcessor.java:561)
[catch] at org.openide.util.RequestProcessor$Processor.run(RequestProcessor.java:986)
Comment 1 massimo 2008-04-23 23:16:10 UTC 
Created attachment 60631 [details]
log
Comment 2 massimo 2008-04-23 23:23:51 UTC 
...just found out that this is issue http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=121289
Closing as duplicate...
Comment 3 Lukas Hasik 2008-04-25 09:53:54 UTC 
reopening to close as duplicate properly
Comment 4 Lukas Hasik 2008-04-25 09:55:04 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 121289 ***