This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 132462 - Annotations don't reflect CVS history
Summary: Annotations don't reflect CVS history
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 129121
Alias: None
Product: versioncontrol
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@versioncontrol
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-04-09 20:14 UTC by janicki
Modified: 2008-04-09 23:59 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
Missing annotations at beginning of files (36.39 KB, image/png)
2008-04-09 20:23 UTC, janicki
Details
Annotation shows line 744 was changed in version 1.69 (38.52 KB, image/png)
2008-04-09 20:24 UTC, janicki
Details
But the CVS diff show no change occurred there in 1.69 (85.55 KB, image/png)
2008-04-09 20:25 UTC, janicki
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description janicki 2008-04-09 20:14:26 UTC
The annotations show some lines as changed more recently than what a CVS>Search History shows.  Also the first hundred or so lines have no annotations at 
at.  See screen shots.
Comment 1 janicki 2008-04-09 20:23:43 UTC
Created attachment 59928 [details]
Missing annotations at beginning of files
Comment 2 janicki 2008-04-09 20:24:37 UTC
Created attachment 59929 [details]
Annotation shows line 744 was changed in version 1.69
Comment 3 janicki 2008-04-09 20:25:25 UTC
Created attachment 59930 [details]
But the CVS diff show no change occurred there in 1.69
Comment 4 Jiri Prox 2008-04-09 23:45:03 UTC
The missing annotations issue is probably duplicate of issue 129121, which should be fixed in current daily builds.

=> reassigning to version control module for evaluation of the rest of the problems
Comment 5 janicki 2008-04-09 23:59:52 UTC
After reading issue 129121, I noticed the pattern...  My annotations are not wrong, they are just offset by the number of lines that are missing at the top.  So 
it looks like the second half of my problem is indeed related to the first.  I will mark this a duplicate of issue 129121 (if I can do that).  I will reopen if I still 
see the problem in the latest dev build.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 129121 ***