This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 11331 - cannot browse cvs filesystems with relative mount point after reboot
Summary: cannot browse cvs filesystems with relative mount point after reboot
Status: VERIFIED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: obsolete
Classification: Unclassified
Component: vcscvs (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Windows ME/2000
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@obsolete
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 29753
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2001-04-11 21:06 UTC by Peter Luttrell
Modified: 2003-01-22 23:46 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Peter Luttrell 2001-04-11 21:06:14 UTC
build 27
jdk 1.3.1b

create new project
create new cvs file system, setup using no relative mount point
create another new cvs file system, this time use same working directory, but 
choose a relative mount point below it.
add new filesystems to project
restart netbeans

now try to expand under the 2nd filesystem and you'll find that you can't 
expand it....but you can expand the 1st.
Comment 1 Pavel Buzek 2001-04-12 14:17:05 UTC
Peter, can you add stacktrace ?
Is is reproducible? I tried this sequence but I was not able to reproduce it.
Comment 2 Jiri Kovalsky 2001-04-13 10:37:21 UTC
I have to say that I can't reproduce it as well. Any reproducable case would be 
appreciated. In such a case I don't think this bug deserves P1 priority !
Comment 3 dmladek 2001-04-13 11:06:26 UTC
I test it with [NB32-26= RC1 & NB32-29]
on linux rh70 & W2K, jdk1.3.0_01 sun
=========================================

and I have no problem. I must set this as WorksForMe.

But if this problrm will persist for you, please reopen
this bug and attach your ide.log, maybe FullThreadDump (CTRL+Break/Pause on W2K
in console) and exact reproductable steps.
Thanks

Comment 4 Jiri Kovalsky 2001-05-30 10:48:46 UTC
Verified as working since we received no more details.
Comment 5 dnoyeB 2003-01-22 23:41:46 UTC
Was probably a duplicate of 11331
Comment 6 dnoyeB 2003-01-22 23:46:14 UTC
Sorry, temporal duplicate of 29753.