This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 110487 - Glassfish installation problem on Mac
Summary: Glassfish installation problem on Mac
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: installer
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All Mac OS X
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Kirill Sorokin
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 102781
Blocks: 110217
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2007-07-21 02:13 UTC by Jun Qian
Modified: 2007-07-25 01:42 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
installation log file (491.02 KB, application/octet-stream)
2007-07-21 02:14 UTC, Jun Qian 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jun Qian 2007-07-21 02:13:28 UTC 
I tried NB 6.0 nightly 07-17 and 07-20 (from bits.netbeans.org) on Mac and I had problem with the installer. Log file
will be attached. 

Note that although /Applications/glassfish-v2-b56 doesn't exist before the installation, it complains "Domain domain1
already exists in /Applications/glassfish-v2-b56/domains." in the log file.
Comment 1 Jun Qian 2007-07-21 02:14:10 UTC 
Created attachment 45473 [details]
installation log file
Comment 2 dlipin 2007-07-22 15:05:11 UTC 
jqian, what jdk have you selected on the Glassfish 
configuration page?
Comment 3 Jun Qian 2007-07-23 19:17:42 UTC 
The JDK version I selected was:

java version "1.6.0-dp"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-dp-b85-18)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0-b85-9-release, mixed mode, sharing)
Comment 4 Jun Qian 2007-07-23 19:18:25 UTC 
I just tried a different JDK version and it worked for me.

java version "1.5.0_06"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_06-112)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_06-64, mixed mode, sharing)
Comment 5 Kirill Sorokin 2007-07-23 19:22:42 UTC 
Which version was selected by default? Was it 6 or 5.0?
Comment 6 Jun Qian 2007-07-23 19:38:15 UTC 
6
Comment 7 Sergey Lunegov 2007-07-24 08:27:53 UTC 
Kirill, looks like regression
Comment 8 Kirill Sorokin 2007-07-24 08:36:22 UTC 
Yeah. Bad luck?
Comment 9 Kirill Sorokin 2007-07-25 01:42:09 UTC 
Hm. I have hard time understanding why it was working before. Or was it? The fix for that issue was never verified.
Anyway, I've removed the code which was redundant and causing this issue.