This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 91588 - Dragging WSDL to process does not work for WSDLs with existing PartnerLinkTypes
Summary: Dragging WSDL to process does not work for WSDLs with existing PartnerLinkTypes
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: soa
Classification: Unclassified
Component: BPEL (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Nikita Krjukov
URL:
Keywords: REGRESSION
: 92063 93250 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-12-27 09:22 UTC by Mikhail Kondratyev
Modified: 2007-02-19 07:24 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Mikhail Kondratyev 2006-12-27 09:22:22 UTC 
Tested with build 2006.12.19_5
Tested platform: Linux
Steps to reproduce:
 - create a new Sync sample
 - open BPEL diagram, in designer
 - drag .wsdl file to the diagram
 - the dialog will be opened to create new PartnerLink. The 'Use Existing
Partner Link Type' option will be checked by default but no roles will be available.
Clicking OK will create a partnerLink with no operations

This is a regression
Comment 1 Mikhail Kondratyev 2007-01-09 06:15:19 UTC 
*** Issue 92063 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 2 Nikita Krjukov 2007-01-25 11:52:28 UTC 
Unfortunately it's not clear which one is the problem:

-- The PLT hasn't got any role specified.
I suppose it's an allowed case because of the WSDL editor allows to delete all 
roles from PLT. 

-- The PLT has a role but it can't be recognized by the PL dialog.
I can't fined a WSDS with a PLT whose roles couldn't be recognized.

-- The PL can be created with such PLT.
I've added the new validation rule which checks if the chosen PLT has any 
rules. 

I hope this small correction is just that was required. 
Reopen the defect otherwize.
Comment 3 Mikhail Kondratyev 2007-01-26 05:14:42 UTC 
*** Issue 93250 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 4 Mikhail Kondratyev 2007-02-14 09:17:16 UTC 
Verified in milestone 6a