This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 9135 - remove unneded titlebars in MDI
Summary: remove unneded titlebars in MDI
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 11010
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Window System (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: Sun Solaris
: P4 normal (vote)
Assignee: mslama
URL:
Keywords: UI
Depends on: 11010
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2001-01-18 03:48 UTC by _ jrichard
Modified: 2008-12-22 22:39 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description _ jrichard 2001-01-18 03:48:28 UTC
There are several good features of MDI, one of which is
that windows no longer need to be managed.  The current MDI
implementation still displays window titles for the windows,
even those windows that can't be moved.  Most of the windows
are obvious by their contents, so unless the windows really can be
moved, the titles should be removed.

The most egregious of these is the output window, which has a title as
well as several tabs.  This wouldn't be quite as bad if I could just
hit escape and have the output window be unmapped (as happens in DevStudio).

The splitter bars are thicker than they need to be as well.

Maximized sourcecode windows don't really need a title as well.
Comment 1 Jan Chalupa 2001-03-12 09:35:27 UTC
Version: 'Dev' -> 3.2
Comment 2 David Simonek 2001-04-09 17:08:36 UTC
I'm changing status to enhancement, because this is sort of request for new
functionality and shoudl be adressed in next release
Comment 3 Jan Chalupa 2001-05-05 20:35:27 UTC
Target milestone -> 3.3
Comment 4 Jan Chalupa 2001-11-27 11:50:49 UTC
Target milestone -> 3.3.1.
Comment 5 Jan Chalupa 2001-11-27 11:54:25 UTC
Target milestone -> 3.3.1.
Comment 6 Jan Chalupa 2002-01-11 14:04:32 UTC
Target milestone -> 3.4
Comment 7 Jan Chalupa 2002-01-11 14:08:25 UTC
Target milestone -> 3.4
Comment 8 Jan Chalupa 2002-01-11 14:09:20 UTC
Target milestone -> 3.4
Comment 9 Jan Chalupa 2002-01-11 14:11:55 UTC
Target milestone -> 3.4
Comment 10 David Simonek 2002-01-28 16:10:36 UTC
Reassigning to Peter. Peter, please go through and evaluate, thanks.
Comment 11 David Simonek 2002-01-28 16:40:01 UTC
Reassigning back to me, I would overload you, Peter :-)
Comment 12 David Simonek 2002-01-29 14:03:19 UTC
Evaluation:
This enhancement has several parts:
a) Quick output unmapping: is covered by separate enhancement, this is
duplicate
b) removal of unneeded titles:
Please, I need more information from UI team, specifying when and
where titlebars should be supressed. Also how you view priority of
this enhancement.
c) width of splitters: I need UI team opinion also, I think splitters
are narrow enough, narrowing them even more would make other
enhancement, "one touch expandable" impossible to implement.
Comment 13 David Simonek 2002-01-29 14:42:10 UTC
Note, one touch expandable I talked about is number 12343
Comment 14 _ jrichard 2002-01-30 01:09:11 UTC
Please disregard my comments about the splitter width.  It is 
fine as it currently stands.  

I do think the window titles could be smaller (see JDeveloper) or
be removed if the window is maximized in the MDI desktop (see J++).
Comment 15 mslama 2002-02-07 12:46:16 UTC
In MDI we have popup menu on title bar so IMO it is better to make
title bar smaller than to remove them completely for some cases. If we
remove them we would loose popup menu on them. (Or perhaps make
presence of title bar optional in some cases - desktop frames,
maximized frames?)
Comment 16 _ jrichard 2002-02-08 04:11:19 UTC
IMHO:  maximized frames shouldn't have a titlebar, mostly 
because I hate to lose a line of code to it.

However -- if the titlebar served some useful purpose
(drag and drop of toplevel components could be a good one)
then the smaller one is OK too...

Comment 17 _ ttran 2002-02-19 14:16:52 UTC
this issue will be solved as part of issue #11010

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 11010 ***
Comment 18 Quality Engineering 2003-07-01 15:50:12 UTC
Resolved for 3.4.x or earlier, no new info since then -> verified.

Comment 19 Quality Engineering 2003-07-01 16:40:41 UTC
Resolved for 3.4.x or earlier, no new info since then -> closing.