This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 90123 - requirement satisfiers are displayed incorrectly with blank line for element names
Summary: requirement satisfiers are displayed incorrectly with blank line for element ...
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: uml
Classification: Unclassified
Component: General (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@uml
URL:
Keywords: REGRESSION
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-11-28 02:02 UTC by Peter Lam
Modified: 2006-12-04 23:09 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
1st attachement (6.57 KB, image/jpeg)
2006-11-28 02:03 UTC, Peter Lam 		Details
2nd attachement (7.35 KB, image/jpeg)
2006-11-28 02:03 UTC, Peter Lam 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Peter Lam 2006-11-28 02:02:56 UTC 
This is a regression from previous builds, not sure which build started to have
this regression.

After dragging requirement to elements on the diagram, a blank line is displayed
for each element under the Satifiers node. If a requirement is associated to
multiple elements, only the 1st element is displayed and other elements are
displayed as blank lines. See 1st attachement.
Once a refresh button from the Design Center is pressed to refresh the display,
everything is displayed properly and correctly. See attachement #2.
Comment 1 Peter Lam 2006-11-28 02:03:25 UTC 
Created attachment 36305 [details]
1st attachement
Comment 2 Peter Lam 2006-11-28 02:03:48 UTC 
Created attachment 36306 [details]
2nd attachement
Comment 3 Peter Lam 2006-11-28 08:42:02 UTC 
The issue was originally filed on build 061127_4 & 061127_5.
Something must have changed that fixed this issue. With the new build 061127_12,
this issue is no longer reproducible.
Comment 4 Viktor Lapitski 2006-11-28 18:27:17 UTC 
put it into resolved accidentally
Comment 5 Viktor Lapitski 2006-11-28 18:28:49 UTC 
the comment was actually meant for previous issue in the list
Comment 6 Viktor Lapitski 2006-11-28 18:30:33 UTC 
the IZ shown mid-air collision between my updates, so again putting this bug
back to resolved