This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 85689 - Add 'did not start' state and it's support for testcases
Summary: Add 'did not start' state and it's support for testcases
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 73182
Alias: None
Product: obsolete
Classification: Unclassified
Component: xtest (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@obsolete
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-09-25 15:32 UTC by Andrey Yamkovoy
Modified: 2006-09-29 13:39 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andrey Yamkovoy 2006-09-25 15:32:29 UTC 
It would be very nice to have state 'did not start' and it's support to mark by 
this state such testcases which did not started by some reason.
Comment 1 pzajac 2006-09-26 16:00:54 UTC 
I don't understand why do you need 'did not start' status? Can you explain your
usecase?
Comment 2 Andrey Yamkovoy 2006-09-27 13:56:08 UTC 
This state is used to identify tests that have not been started for some reason 
(for ex. IDE was closed while tests running) to attract attension to these 
tests. Othewise we can miss such tests and do not know that we have problems 
with some tests. Also in case we have this state we will have the constant 
number of all tests in reports independ on test result.
Comment 3 Jiri Skrivanek 2006-09-29 10:21:30 UTC 
The case when a test case(s) is not finished or is not started at all is already
handled by XTest (see issue 73182). The status of test is then 'uknown' and
message says either 'Did not finish' or 'Did not start'. The requirement of
constant number of executed tests should be satisfied. I don't think we need a
special status for this cases.
Comment 4 Andrey Yamkovoy 2006-09-29 13:39:02 UTC 
Great. It's what we want. I did not know that it was already implemented.
So, I mark this issue as duplicate of 73182.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 73182 ***