This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 79265 - WSDL editor allowing to add 'soap operation fault' more than once with the same name in 'Fault'
Summary: WSDL editor allowing to add 'soap operation fault' more than once with the sa...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: xml
Classification: Unclassified
Component: WSDL Tools (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Shivanand Kini
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-06-27 22:05 UTC by bugbridge
Modified: 2007-09-17 21:44 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description bugbridge 2006-06-27 22:05:17 UTC 
Original status: 4-Defer, Substatus: Future Project; Suggested Status: 
RESOLVED (Resolution:REMIND)

Original Target Release: coke_dev; Suggested Target Milestone : 5.5

These items should be added to the Status Whiteboard: MONROVIA
Original submitter: malapati

Description:
Build Details:

Steps to Reproduce: 
1. Add binding.
2. Add operation.
3. Add fault. Fault is adding successfully 
4. Add extension element ->soap operation fault to the fault. soap operation 
fault is added successfully.
5. Add extension element ->soap operation fault to the fault.

Actual Result: 
WSDL editor is allowing to add 'soap operation fault' more than once with the 
same name in the fault with out throwing any warning message.

Expected Result:
WSDL editor will allow to add 'soap operation fault' more than once with the 
diffeerent name.

Observation:
1.Other elements like Message,Porttype, binding etc are creating more than 
once with different names.


Evaluation:
This can be fixed in future. wsdl validation can be enhanced also to catch 
this.
Comment 1 Jiri Prox 2007-09-17 21:44:53 UTC 
Obsolete milestone, please reevaluate