This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Hi, For some reason my NetBeans has been running extremely slow. And so I notice small wastes of time. The one that I noticed today deals with the refreshing of the Navigator. I was going to check files in using the VCS Groups tab and selected the top file and was going to select the bottom file as well, but the IDE froze for a considerable amount of time before I could select the other files. The Navigator window was showing that it was refreshing its view. Once it finally finished I could select other files. I don't think NetBeans should be updating the navigator as a result of selecting it in the VCS Groups (or Project or Files) tab. It seems to me that it should only refresh when the file is the current file in the editor. A side note...even when selecting a different file tab in the editor, the refresh of the Navigator seems to take forever (4 - 5 seconds on my beefy machine) preventing me from immediately being able to edit or move around. Can't the Navigator be thrown into a separate thread or something so that it doesn't hang when its updating? A side issue for the Navigator. How about showing the method that the editor is in at the top of the window. Hi-lighing the method was a big recent improvement but is a pale gray color and is always in a different place in the window which makes it harder to find. I find myself missing the combo box at the top of the editor window as in versions past. Mostly because I knew right where to look and it wasn't causing me these slow-down problems.
I agree that the navigator should only update when a new file is selected in the editor. Unfortunately, the navigator doesn't do that either: on 6.51 (and later dailies), the navigator doesn't update until you actually click somewhere in the file (you continue to "see" methods that belong to whatever the previously active file was)! This seems to be a recent change - and it's neither intuitive nor correct.
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 167708 ***