This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 68895 - Delete action is slow
Summary: Delete action is slow
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: editor
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -- Other -- (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All Windows XP
: P2 blocker with 1 vote (vote)
Assignee: issues@editor
URL:
Keywords: PERFORMANCE
: 68926 69274 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 69077
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2005-11-17 15:08 UTC by Martin Roskanin
Modified: 2007-11-05 13:44 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Roskanin 2005-11-17 15:08:25 UTC 
Press delete and hold it. There is very slow response.
Comment 1 Martin Roskanin 2005-11-18 11:02:43 UTC 
*** Issue 68926 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 2 Martin Roskanin 2005-11-18 11:50:17 UTC 
openide's DeleteAction supports asynchronous callback - it causes that editor
DeleteCharAction is called from non-AWT thread, what is wrong
Comment 3 mslama 2005-11-23 12:58:27 UTC 
Editor is actualy unusable for serious work. Is anybody working on this? Have
you considered rollback of change before you find fix??
Comment 4 Martin Roskanin 2005-11-23 13:10:50 UTC 
"Delete" keybinding was removed from editor bindings after the fix of the issue
#68653
It causes the problem, where delete keystroke doesn't work at all - issue #68879
The fix of issue #68879 cannot be done ideal because of asynchronous behaviour
of the openide's DeleteAction. After fast track issue #69101 will be
implemented, the temporary fix would be possible, but also not ideal.

Anyway, the main problem is removal of delete keybinding from editor and it
should be fixed after the fix of issue #69077 on which this issue depends.
Comment 5 Jan Pokorsky 2005-11-24 16:12:22 UTC 
*** Issue 69274 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 6 Martin Roskanin 2005-11-28 12:48:04 UTC 
fixed along with issue #69077