This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 66646 - [50cat] suggestion code doesn't honor indentation settings
Summary: [50cat] suggestion code doesn't honor indentation settings
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: java
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Unsupported (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@editor
URL:
Keywords:
: 64957 65276 66721 68510 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-10-12 17:45 UTC by gholmer
Modified: 2007-09-26 09:14 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description gholmer 2005-10-12 17:45:31 UTC
[ BUILD # : 200510101800 ]
[ JDK VERSION : 1.5.0_03 ]

0) set indentation to 2, replace tab w/space
1) create class implementing Runnable
2) compile, error because run() not present
3) click suggestion badge to put public void run()
4) code is indented by 4, not 2
Comment 1 Daniel Prusa 2005-10-19 14:34:43 UTC
*** Issue 65276 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 2 Daniel Prusa 2005-10-19 14:34:53 UTC
*** Issue 64957 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 3 Pavel Flaska 2005-10-20 09:30:23 UTC
Checking in src/org/netbeans/modules/javacore/ExclusiveMutex.java;
/cvs/java/javacore/src/org/netbeans/modules/javacore/ExclusiveMutex.java,v  <--
 ExclusiveMutex.java
new revision: 1.51; previous revision: 1.50
done
Checking in src/org/netbeans/modules/javacore/JMManager.java;
/cvs/java/javacore/src/org/netbeans/modules/javacore/JMManager.java,v  <-- 
JMManager.java
new revision: 1.123; previous revision: 1.122
done
Checking in
src/org/netbeans/modules/javacore/jmiimpl/javamodel/MetadataElement.java;
/cvs/java/javacore/src/org/netbeans/modules/javacore/jmiimpl/javamodel/MetadataElement.java,v
 <--  MetadataElement.java
new revision: 1.60; previous revision: 1.59
done
Comment 4 Daniel Prusa 2005-10-25 15:36:32 UTC
*** Issue 66721 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 5 Pavel Flaska 2005-11-15 14:35:43 UTC
*** Issue 68510 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 6 gholmer 2006-01-18 13:51:54 UTC
Verified fixed in 5.0 RC1.