This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 55021 - Sun Ejb Jar screen has an empty Name field
Summary: Sun Ejb Jar screen has an empty Name field
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 56816
Alias: None
Product: serverplugins
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Sun Appserver 8 (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: _ pcw
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-02-16 09:49 UTC by Petr Blaha
Modified: 2007-12-08 02:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Petr Blaha 2005-02-16 09:49:14 UTC 
In sun-ejb-jar.xml visual DD is empty Name fields
for Sun Ejb Jar and a disabled Unique Id field
(that is a generated field AFAIK so need not be
displayed).
Comment 1 _ pcw 2006-05-29 19:52:53 UTC 
Unique ID field is removed now.  (any 5.5 daily build after mid May, 2006).

Any opinion on what should happen with the empty name field? I'm don't know if
the appserver uses it for anything.  I suppose we could fill it with the project
name.
Comment 2 Vince Kraemer 2007-12-08 02:43:50 UTC 
here is a left-field idea... can we have the EJB 'tab' be the default tab.  the Name may be empty... but it isn't in
anyones face.. which is why this issue exists in the first place...

raising to p3 for 6.1... if it isn't easy to change we can lower it back to p4 or close as will not fix.
Comment 3 _ pcw 2007-12-08 02:51:03 UTC 
In the multiview layout, it's not that easy to change the starting tab (remember at this level, the same code runs all
the sun-??? editors).

I don't think this bug is a P3 according to guidelines so I think it should stay a P4.  If I find a good solution, I'll
fix it, regardless of priority and if I don't, then it shouldn't count against our ship criteria.
Comment 4 _ pcw 2007-12-08 02:53:24 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 56816 ***