This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 50393 - Show file name in Compile File output tab
Summary: Show file name in Compile File output tab
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: java
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Tomas Zezula
URL:
Keywords: UI
Depends on: 43072
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2004-10-13 22:30 UTC by fni
Modified: 2011-08-31 14:05 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description fni 2004-10-13 22:30:59 UTC
I used 3.6 and it has buttons for file compile/build, not 
just for Main file, but in 4.0 I can't find the buttons for 
them, they are very important, I wonder it they will show 
up in the official version.

Another probelm is in 3.6 when I compile or execute a 
file(not main file), I can see the file name in the output 
window, now in 4.0, it only says "compile-single", 
please do it the 3.6 way, also the tab in output  window, 
it says "(compile-single)", I'd like to see the file name.

Some other important button missing : file save/saveas.

Hope I can define a button by the Tools/Option/UI to 
assign my script to a user defined button , if this already 
exist, please let me know. Thanks
Comment 1 jrojcek 2004-10-19 14:25:17 UTC
fni, you report two non-related bugs here. The "Major Buttons Missing" has already been 
reported and we are working on fixing it. Please look at:

http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47527

Regarding the missing file name in the output window tabs, I think it hasn't been reported 
yet. So, I suggest to change the summary of this issue to "Show a file name in Compile 
File output tabs", and also changing the priority to P3.
Comment 2 _ rkubacki 2004-10-21 16:01:33 UTC
Current implementation works as designed so this sounds more like an
RFE to me