This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 50214 - Not all usages reported
Summary: Not all usages reported
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 50688
Alias: None
Product: editor
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Refactoring (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jan Becicka
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-10-11 10:29 UTC by _ rkubacki
Modified: 2007-04-03 18:02 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description _ rkubacki 2004-10-11 10:29:13 UTC
build from sources from Oct 11, JDK 1.5.0

o.n.lib.editor.fold.CustomFoldManager.scanToken
should report usage from getMarkList but it does not.
Comment 1 Jan Becicka 2004-10-12 16:07:40 UTC
It does work for me. Can you provide exact steps to reproduce? Can you
reproduce it with clean userdir? Thanks.
Comment 2 _ rkubacki 2004-10-12 16:23:49 UTC
I cannot reproduce it with fresh userdir but with existing one I can.
There is also message
'org.netbeans.modules.javacore.parser.MDRParser$CallableRefInfo@3611cc
not found in org/netbeans/editor/CustomFoldManager.java' printed to
console.
Comment 3 Jan Becicka 2004-10-13 06:58:02 UTC
BTW CustomFoldManager.java is "strange" class. It's package
declaration is "org.netbeans.lib.editor.fold", but it is in folder
"org/netbeans/editor".
Comment 4 Jan Becicka 2004-10-18 12:50:27 UTC
Incorrect package declaration can confuse javac - the package
declaration is fixed now. Radime, can you reproduce it in latest
build? Thanks. 
Comment 5 _ rkubacki 2004-10-19 12:04:22 UTC
OK, now it works well after I rebuilt the caches.

OTOH if javac can be confused here what we can do to help user. What
other functionalities can fail as a result?
Comment 6 Jan Becicka 2004-10-27 13:44:38 UTC
There are 2 possible problem:
1. With javac as I mentioned above - this is WONTFIX
2. Other problem can be deep in javacore - see issue 50688


*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 50688 ***