This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 50013 - Value objects in WebServices are not supported
Summary: Value objects in WebServices are not supported
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 49889
Alias: None
Product: webservices
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: _ ludo
URL:
Keywords: RANDOM
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-10-06 13:41 UTC by Lukas Jungmann
Modified: 2004-10-15 09:40 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
value object source (661 bytes, text/plain)
2004-10-06 13:42 UTC, Lukas Jungmann 		Details
ws source (716 bytes, text/plain)
2004-10-06 13:43 UTC, Lukas Jungmann 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lukas Jungmann 2004-10-06 13:41:50 UTC 
as writen in article about Developing webservices
at java.sun.com[1] i tried to return "value
object" (see User.java) from web service. I
expected that new value object is returned, but
instead of that exception is thrown.

[1]:
http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2EE/j2ee_ws/
Comment 1 Lukas Jungmann 2004-10-06 13:42:57 UTC 
Created attachment 18078 [details]
value object source
Comment 2 Lukas Jungmann 2004-10-06 13:43:39 UTC 
Created attachment 18079 [details]
ws source
Comment 3 Lukas Jungmann 2004-10-06 13:52:10 UTC 
sometimes in build 041006 works ok, but i'm usually recieving
MissingPortException.
Comment 4 Roderico Cruz 2004-10-06 17:52:23 UTC 
This works fine. The failure you are experiencing is related to issue
49889, where if a web app with a web service is redeployed, running it
fails with a "missing port information" message. For now, to get
around this, when you want to redeploy the web app, delete the
contents of the build directory first.
Comment 5 Roderico Cruz 2004-10-07 21:03:03 UTC 
Please confirm if this is indeed a duplicate of 49889 and if so,
change the resolution of this issue.
Comment 6 Petr Blaha 2004-10-11 13:24:55 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 49889 ***
Comment 7 Petr Blaha 2004-10-13 10:40:04 UTC 
Remove all issues from temporary component.