This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Duplicate pair in treePair1: SL[/Executor/JavaExternalExecutor pair2: SL[/Executor/JavaExternalExecutor index1: 24 index2: 24 item1:
Created attachment 16669 [details] stack trace
Excuse me, but can you please specify what is this bug about ? Some reproduction procedure, IDE is deadlocked etc ?
I do not understand it much as well and do not know why it's P1 priority. But it looks that it does not have anything with VSS. There is a search for some java settings, so I'm moving it to java module for evaluation (or perhaps it's a bug of lookup?).
This is a rough description of what happened from reporter: 1. He wants just to run the project using F6 key. 2. The attached exception is thrown. He thinks it may be related to manually changed SSDIR option in customizer dialog of another VSS filesystem but in different project. Martine, do you have any idea what might be wrong here ?
I don't have idea what is this bug about. What I see on the stack trace is, that JavaSettings does this: Lookup.Template temp=new Lookup.Template(service,serviceId,null); Lookup.Result res=Lookup.getDefault().lookup(temp); Object[] instances; res.removeLookupListener(this); res.addLookupListener(this); instances=res.allInstances().toArray(); And then IllegalStateException is thrown. From java point of view, I propose to close this issue as resolved FIXED, WORKSFORME, INVALID of whatever, because duplicate entry JavaExternalExecutor is no more exists in java module. JavaExternalExecutor was replaced by new build system in promo-D. Reassigning to openide. Please check, that everything is correct in Lookup. Thanks
Submitter reported that the same exception appeared after restart of the IDE. He's gonna check the same workflow in current development build of NetBeans 4.0. BTW, he does not feel strongly about the priority he used.
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 40364 ***
verified duplicate