This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 41387 - Database Explorer can lockup whole application
Summary: Database Explorer can lockup whole application
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 37051
Alias: None
Product: db
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Windows ME/2000
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Radko Najman
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-03-26 00:24 UTC by cbrettin
Modified: 2006-06-05 11:04 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Thread dump (11.96 KB, text/plain)
2004-03-28 23:48 UTC, cbrettin 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description cbrettin 2004-03-26 00:24:49 UTC 
When using the dbe with an oracle DB (oracle:thin:
JDBC dirver)certain ui operations (expanding nodes
to display table columns, table indexes etc) can
be very slow. This may be an issue with the orcale
diver.... But, when another operation is attempted
on the same data source while the tree update is
still in progress the whole netbeans GUI freezes
indefinitely (at zero CPU load).
Comment 1 Radko Najman 2004-03-26 11:00:21 UTC 
I guess that's probably the same issue as #37051. Most of the database
calls run in a separete thread except of this issue. Can you attach
the thread dump when the IDE is frozen, please?
Comment 2 cbrettin 2004-03-28 23:48:34 UTC 
Created attachment 14181 [details]
Thread dump
Comment 3 cbrettin 2004-03-29 00:01:04 UTC 
Stack trace is for state after expanding a tree node, then  using the
context menu to attempt to list the data in a table.

IDE unfroze shortly after thread dump so I'm not sure if it is exactly
the same as long duration freezes previously... or otherwise I've
discovered how to unlock :/
Comment 4 Radko Najman 2004-08-13 09:44:19 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 37051 ***
Comment 5 dmladek 2004-09-07 13:24:14 UTC 
ok, seems like a dup