This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
[ JDK VERSION : J2SE 1.4.2_02 ] Opened a source file, right-click a Java's core class method and selected "Show Javadoc". It took me a while to notice the editor's new tab with only the "browser" icon (no text!!!) containing the Swing internal browser, showing the desired Javadoc. At the very least, it should have grabbed the focus and become the "selected" tab, showing me the info I had just requested. I don't think I would have noticed this tab if I had had more than a few files opened. Since all the other tabs have some text, why not this one as well? How about "JPanel[Javadoc]" or something like that?
Got the same problem when trying to invoke the "Auto-Comment" menu item from the "Tools" right-click contextual menu. A new document tab is added, but it doesn't become the "selected" one. Again, if you didn't notice the new tab, you think the action doesn't work or is not finished yet. I guess the problem is not really Javadoc related, but more on the new Windowing system...
*** Issue 39720 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
*** Issue 39871 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
I am increasing a priority, because it is really annoying behaviour.
Happens with CVS diff, as well.
*** Issue 39885 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Added back [36cat] prefix. It is used for some special query.
The editor tab containing javadoc or Auto-Comment customizer gets focus properly now. The javadoc tab's label is out of javadoc module scope. You can file an issue to the openide component so that the internal browser provides some title. /cvs/core/src/org/netbeans/core/NbTopManager.java,v1.200 /cvs/javadoc/src/org/netbeans/modules/javadoc/comments/AutoCommentAction.java,v1.26 /cvs/javadoc/src/org/netbeans/modules/javadoc/comments/AutoCommentPanel.java,v1.50
Verified in the current q-build.
*** Issue 41083 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***