This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 39370 - failure in testXMLLayerCacheManager
Summary: failure in testXMLLayerCacheManager
Status: VERIFIED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -- Other -- (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC SunOS
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jaroslav Tulach
URL:
Keywords: TEST
: 40084 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-01-29 14:12 UTC by pzajac
Modified: 2008-12-22 19:44 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
exception stacktrace (799 bytes, text/plain)
2004-01-29 14:12 UTC, pzajac 		Details
correct stacktrace (1.25 KB, text/plain)
2004-01-29 15:08 UTC, pzajac 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description pzajac 2004-01-29 14:12:05 UTC 
Test Suite:
org.netbeans.core.projects.cache.XMLLayerCacheManagerImplTest

Message:
org/netbeans/core/projects/cache/XMLLayerCacheManagerImpl
Comment 1 pzajac 2004-01-29 14:12:35 UTC 
Created attachment 13138 [details]
exception stacktrace
Comment 2 Petr Nejedly 2004-01-29 14:52:10 UTC 
How does the stack trace correspond to the XMLLayerCache?
Comment 3 pzajac 2004-01-29 15:08:41 UTC 
Created attachment 13142 [details]
correct stacktrace
Comment 4 pzajac 2004-01-29 15:10:07 UTC 
I'm sorry for my mistake. The first stacktrace is invalid.
Comment 5 Jesse Glick 2004-01-29 15:57:21 UTC 
Jardo I think you forgot to delete the test when you deleted the
source as part of #38420. Right? If so, just delete the test.
Comment 6 Petr Nejedly 2004-01-29 16:00:00 UTC 
Thanks, now I see.
Please update your sources, the test (as well as the tested class) is
not in the codebase anymore.
Comment 7 Petr Nejedly 2004-01-29 16:00:55 UTC 
Ugh, the issuezilla didn't make it, so again, for proper status...
Comment 8 Petr Nejedly 2004-01-29 16:01:49 UTC 
Now correct resolution...
Sorry for flooding your mailboxes.
Comment 9 pzajac 2004-02-13 14:23:32 UTC 
*** Issue 40084 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 10 pzajac 2004-03-15 10:50:42 UTC 
v