This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 38699 - Inappropriate exception from SyntaxElement.getPrevious/Next
Summary: Inappropriate exception from SyntaxElement.getPrevious/Next
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: xml
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Text-Edit (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Milan Kuchtiak
URL:
Keywords: RANDOM
: 37872 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-01-13 17:00 UTC by Jesse Glick
Modified: 2007-09-25 01:33 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Suggested patch to make the bug less onerous (does not fix the bug) (1.88 KB, patch)
2004-01-13 17:01 UTC, Jesse Glick 		Details | Diff
Stack trace from exception I encountered once in dev-040109 (1.66 KB, text/plain)
2004-01-13 17:03 UTC, Jesse Glick 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jesse Glick 2004-01-13 17:00:35 UTC 
At some point when using Ant code completion
(ant/grammar) I got a UOException thrown from
SE.getNext, for no reason I can see (do not know
how to reproduce).

Regardless of why this condition was encountered,
UOException is not the right exception - that
means that an attempt was made to use methods from
an unsupported DOM version etc. That is not the
case here - the methods normally work fine.

Attaching a patch which at least behaves more
gracefully: prints a diagnostic message and then
returns null, the documented fallback value.
Comment 1 Jesse Glick 2004-01-13 17:01:10 UTC 
Created attachment 12863 [details]
Suggested patch to make the bug less onerous (does not fix the bug)
Comment 2 Jesse Glick 2004-01-13 17:03:52 UTC 
Created attachment 12864 [details]
Stack trace from exception I encountered once in dev-040109
Comment 3 Milan Kuchtiak 2004-02-27 09:16:17 UTC 
Not critical for Promo B.
Comment 4 Jesse Glick 2004-02-27 16:39:30 UTC 
At least consider the attached patch for B. Very simple and makes the
symptoms of the bug less evil.
Comment 5 _ pkuzel 2004-07-30 17:07:08 UTC 
Applied, thanks Jesse.

SyntaxElement.java
new revision: 1.9
Comment 6 _ pkuzel 2004-08-04 14:09:29 UTC 
*** Issue 37872 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***