This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 38112 - testDocumentCannotBeModified
Summary: testDocumentCannotBeModified
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 42005
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Text (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Windows ME/2000
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Petr Nejedly
URL:
Keywords: TEST
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-12-15 13:56 UTC by pzajac
Modified: 2008-12-22 20:12 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
exception stacktrace (1.39 KB, text/plain)
2003-12-15 13:58 UTC, pzajac 		Details
exception stacktrace (1.35 KB, text/plain)
2004-02-06 15:29 UTC, pzajac 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description pzajac 2003-12-15 13:56:47 UTC 
[jdk 1.4.2]
The test failed on WinXP and Win 2k on 2003131900
and 2003121900 build. Please evaluate if there is
a problem.
Comment 1 pzajac 2003-12-15 13:58:15 UTC 
Created attachment 12578 [details]
exception stacktrace
Comment 2 Petr Nejedly 2004-01-09 19:05:42 UTC 
No problem.
The verification strategy is very interesting one (the test checks the
content of the status bar) and may be fragile (something might have
cleaned the status text in the mean time).
Tests run OK now.
Comment 3 pzajac 2004-01-20 15:03:18 UTC 
ok. If the test failed again I will reopen this bug.
Comment 4 pzajac 2004-02-06 15:27:47 UTC 
the test fails again
Comment 5 pzajac 2004-02-06 15:29:00 UTC 
Created attachment 13302 [details]
exception stacktrace
Comment 6 Petr Nejedly 2004-02-16 16:22:21 UTC 
Reproduced (once) the test failure while testing fix for other issue...
Comment 7 Jaroslav Tulach 2004-02-25 08:11:45 UTC 
The problem is probably in UndoRedo manager that is too asynchronous,
it needs rewrite as in current state it is not testable at all, but we
should not do it for 3.6.
Comment 8 Petr Nejedly 2004-08-16 15:56:15 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 42005 ***
Comment 9 pzajac 2004-08-17 15:35:50 UTC 
v