This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 35973 - "java.lang.IllegalStateException: This must happen in the event thread!" is thrown
Summary: "java.lang.IllegalStateException: This must happen in the event thread!" is t...
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 35953
Alias: None
Product: utilities
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Search (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Marian Petras
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-09-09 15:28 UTC by ehucka
Modified: 2003-12-11 14:27 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
ISE's stacktrace. (1.30 KB, text/plain)
2003-09-09 15:29 UTC, ehucka
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description ehucka 2003-09-09 15:28:00 UTC
I've only run rename refactoring on some class and
many IllegalStateExceptions had thrown.
Comment 1 ehucka 2003-09-09 15:29:33 UTC
Created attachment 11556 [details]
ISE's stacktrace.
Comment 2 Martin Matula 2003-09-09 15:48:10 UTC
This obviously does not happen for every rename refactoring. So could
you please provide a testcase/instructions to reproduce this problem?
Thanks,
Martin
Comment 3 ehucka 2003-09-09 16:42:23 UTC
I'm sorry, I've restarted IDE and I cannot reproduce it durring
renaming now. But it maybe relates with changes of files outside the
IDE. I remove some files from mounted filesystem (outside the IDE) and
this exceptions occures. I had made something analogous before I
reported this issue.
Comment 4 ehucka 2003-09-16 10:20:52 UTC
This exception is thrown from automated tests and after changes of
java files outside the IDE.
Comment 5 Jan Becicka 2003-09-16 10:26:51 UTC
ISE was thrown from search module.
Comment 6 Jan Becicka 2003-09-17 11:00:52 UTC
Has nothing to do with refactoring.
Comment 7 Marian Petras 2003-09-17 16:15:16 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 35953 ***
Comment 8 ehucka 2003-09-25 15:46:28 UTC
Verified.