This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 35855 - CookieActionTest is failing
Summary: CookieActionTest is failing
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Actions (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: All All
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jaroslav Tulach
URL:
Keywords: REGRESSION, TEST
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-09-01 11:03 UTC by Jaroslav Tulach
Modified: 2008-12-22 21:52 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
The failure report (7.51 KB, text/html)
2003-09-01 11:03 UTC, Jaroslav Tulach 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jaroslav Tulach 2003-09-01 11:03:28 UTC 
After the change from node.getCookie to
node.getLookup().lookupItem two tests seem to fail
in main trunk.
Comment 1 Jaroslav Tulach 2003-09-01 11:03:53 UTC 
Created attachment 11476 [details]
The failure report
Comment 2 Jaroslav Tulach 2003-09-01 15:25:31 UTC 
I have a fix in org.openide.nodes.NodeLookup. Will commit soon. Peter,
next time please run 

cd openide/test
ant realclean
ant

before commit, especially if doing changes in something as fragile as
nodes, lookup, actions...
Comment 3 Peter Zavadsky 2003-09-01 15:28:37 UTC 
OK, thanks.
Comment 4 Jaroslav Tulach 2003-09-01 15:41:27 UTC 
NodeLookup.java 1.6
FilterNode.java 1.81
Node.java 1.75
Comment 5 Jaroslav Tulach 2003-09-01 15:43:10 UTC 
Btw. Peter, I think it was good that you broke the tests as you found
serious design problem and I could fix it. Of course better to commit
the problem and the fix at once, but anyway now we have better coverage.
Comment 6 Marian Mirilovic 2003-09-02 10:47:46 UTC 
Yarda, mark as fixed again please :)
Comment 7 Jaroslav Tulach 2003-09-02 11:42:37 UTC 
Only mark? Ok, marked again. It works on my machine, does it fail on
your? I do not understand why it was reopened.
Comment 8 Marian Mirilovic 2003-09-02 14:39:16 UTC 
No, I haven't tried it. I just saw that you have marked it as RESOLVED
without Resolution - it happend because conflict when you were commit
the change in issue form :(
Comment 9 Jaroslav Tulach 2003-09-02 14:56:17 UTC 
I see. Next time I will not mark issues as fixed when there is a conflict.
Comment 10 Marian Mirilovic 2004-02-25 15:28:34 UTC 
verified - fixed by reporter