This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 30335 - CVS Status reporting incorrectly
Summary: CVS Status reporting incorrectly
Status: VERIFIED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: obsolete
Classification: Unclassified
Component: vcsgeneric (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Windows ME/2000
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@obsolete
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-01-24 15:12 UTC by dnoyeB
Modified: 2003-01-28 13:19 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
picture of run-on status messages (83.32 KB, image/jpeg)
2003-01-24 15:13 UTC, dnoyeB
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description dnoyeB 2003-01-24 15:12:37 UTC
Look at the attached jpeg to see the run-on
statuses.  This seems to occur when
"ProcessAllFiles" is selected.  I hit refresh but
it didnt change the run-on statuses.  But when I
turned off "ProcessAllFiles" then hit refresh, the
statuses went back to normal.

Plus whats up with the Local everywhere when these
files are not local?
Comment 1 dnoyeB 2003-01-24 15:13:33 UTC
Created attachment 8669 [details]
picture of run-on status messages
Comment 2 Martin Entlicher 2003-01-24 15:53:07 UTC
Well, this is "as designed".
The node, that you see in the explorer, represents more than one
physical file on disk. Normally (when ProcessAllFiles is FALSE) only
"important" files are considered for VCS operations (all but *.class
files). So you get the status annotation only for the one .java file,
that is considered.
However when you turn ProcessAllFiles to TRUE, *all* files are
considered for VCS operations and you get the annotations for all
files. Because your classes are local, you get "Local" string
annotation for every class file that belongs to the node.
Comment 3 Jiri Kovalsky 2003-01-28 08:00:40 UTC
I believe you understood the explanation. If not, ask further.
Verifying as invalid issue.
Comment 4 dnoyeB 2003-01-28 13:19:44 UTC
Yes, I understood it.  Probably should file an REF because its ugly,
but I suppose its not a bug.