This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 29116 - NPE: PopupMenu on CVS FS
Summary: NPE: PopupMenu on CVS FS
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 28978
Alias: None
Product: javaee
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@javaee
URL:
Keywords: RANDOM
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-11-28 13:53 UTC by dmladek
Modified: 2006-06-05 00:00 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
stacktrace of NPE (2.07 KB, text/plain)
2002-11-28 13:53 UTC, dmladek 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description dmladek 2002-11-28 13:53:24 UTC 
Product Version       = NetBeans IDE Dev (Build
200211271836)
  IDE Versioning        = IDE/1 spec=3.22
impl=200211271836
  Operating System      = Linux version 2.4.18
running on i386
  Java; VM; Vendor      = 1.4.1_01; Java
HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.4.1_01-b01; Sun
Microsystems Inc.
  Java Home             =
/usr/java/j2sdk1.4/sun/jdk1.4.1_01/jre
  System Locale; Encod. = cs_CZ; ISO-8859-2
  Home Dir; Current Dir = /home.local/danielm;
/DISKS/storage3/forte/NBdev-last/netbeans/bin
  IDE Install; User Dir =
/home.local/danielm/NBdev-last;
/home.local/danielm/.netbeans/dev
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I've just trying Project buld... so there not much
to say about how it happened:-(
Only taht I was lucky to add cvs FS under Source
node... Is it OK? to add it dirrectly under Source?
and, I invoked popup menu and NPE appeares

see stacktare
Comment 1 dmladek 2002-11-28 13:53:54 UTC 
Created attachment 8092 [details]
stacktrace of NPE
Comment 2 Vitezslav Stejskal 2002-11-28 15:04:09 UTC 
NPE thrown from web module.
Comment 3 Milan Kubec 2002-11-28 16:17:16 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 28978 ***
Comment 4 dmladek 2003-07-08 18:39:40 UTC 
seems like a dup