This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
The IMT is showing me classes from java.lang but is treating them differently since they are automatically imported. Being treated differently led to some of my confusion in issue 23886. Since java.lang is automatically imported I don't see the value of presenting them in Steps 2 and 3.
They are not in step 3. It does not hurt to have them in step 2. In some special case it can be useful to use FQN for them. Since it is special case the default value is 'no change' for java lang classes. The same situation is valid also for classes from the same package as processed class.
Sorry, you are correct about Step 3. Good point about classes in the same package as the current file. When is it useful to use an FQN for a class in java.lang? My concern is visual clutter. Having additional lines that the user needs to ignore does not help the user process the valuable information.
Resolved for 3.4.x or earlier, no new info since then -> closing.