This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 209430 - IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 65, Size: 65
Summary: IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 65, Size: 65
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 208589
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Nodes (show other bugs)
Version: 7.2
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Jaroslav Tulach
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-03-11 11:59 UTC by Vladimir Voskresensky
Modified: 2012-05-07 19:08 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 185754

Attachments
stacktrace (3.35 KB, text/plain)
2012-03-11 11:59 UTC, Vladimir Voskresensky 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Vladimir Voskresensky 2012-03-11 11:59:48 UTC 
This bug was originally marked as duplicate of bug 147825, that is already resolved. This bug is still valid, so this seems to be another bug, but it might be related.

Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 20120311-209c662b6f6a)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM, 20.4-b02, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_29-b11
OS: SunOS

User Comments:
vv159170: scroll expanded view




Stacktrace: 
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 65, Size: 65
   at java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck(ArrayList.java:547)
   at java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:322)
   at org.openide.nodes.EntrySupport$Lazy$LazySnapshot.get(EntrySupport.java:1873)
   at org.openide.nodes.EntrySupport$Lazy$LazySnapshot.get(EntrySupport.java:1861)
   at org.openide.explorer.view.VisualizerChildren.getChildAt(VisualizerChildren.java:127)
   at org.openide.explorer.view.VisualizerNode.getChildAt(VisualizerNode.java:321)
Comment 1 Vladimir Voskresensky 2012-03-11 11:59:52 UTC 
Created attachment 116553 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Jaroslav Tulach 2012-05-07 19:08:21 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 208589 ***