This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 207465 - Disable keep alive failed dialog
Summary: Disable keep alive failed dialog
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 209043
Alias: None
Product: php
Classification: Unclassified
Component: FTP Support (show other bugs)
Version: 7.1
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Tomas Mysik
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-01-18 15:29 UTC by jmsosso
Modified: 2012-03-29 14:01 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Writing code and... (34.65 KB, image/png)
2012-01-18 15:29 UTC, jmsosso 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description jmsosso 2012-01-18 15:29:01 UTC 
Created attachment 115030 [details]
Writing code and...

My server have a timeout of 600 seconds:

...
200 NOOP command successful
NOOP
421 No transfer timeout (600 seconds): closing control connection
QUIT

Ok, no problem, but it's very annoying that NB shows a dialog at this moment interrupting me.

Would not it be better to simply reconnect the next time you need to upload a file?
Comment 1 jmsosso 2012-01-31 09:11:29 UTC 
It's very annoying, under Ubuntu when I'm using another application and the timeout occur it loss the focus and Netbeans appears in the foreground with the mentioned dialog.
Comment 2 Tomas Mysik 2012-03-20 15:03:36 UTC 
More bug than an enhancement.
Comment 3 mccxiv 2012-03-21 14:34:38 UTC 
Setting Keep-alive interval to 0 (disabled) doesn't send the QUIT command as expected, this causes the dialog once the server complains
Comment 4 Tomas Mysik 2012-03-29 13:44:07 UTC 
Fixed for NB 7.2.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 209043 ***
Comment 5 jmsosso 2012-03-29 13:51:09 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Fixed for NB 7.2.
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 209043 ***

Well, I think that bug 209043 is a duplicate of this one, look at the dates :-(
Comment 6 Tomas Mysik 2012-03-29 14:01:22 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Well, I think that bug 209043 is a duplicate of this one, look at the dates :-(

And the problem is...? ;)