This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 205905 - LowPerformance took 3s at BaseDocument.insertString()
Summary: LowPerformance took 3s at BaseDocument.insertString()
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: editor
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -- Other -- (show other bugs)
Version: 7.1
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Miloslav Metelka
URL:
Keywords: PERFORMANCE
: 199430 206286 206287 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-12-04 13:57 UTC by Exceptions Reporter
Modified: 2012-10-11 11:51 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 176500


Attachments
nps snapshot (64.96 KB, application/nps)
2011-12-04 13:57 UTC, Exceptions Reporter
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Exceptions Reporter 2011-12-04 13:57:12 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE 7.1 Beta (Build 201109252201)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 19.1-b02, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_24-b07
OS: Windows 7
Maximum slowness yet reported was 4886 ms, average is 3855
Comment 1 Exceptions Reporter 2011-12-04 13:57:17 UTC
Created attachment 113800 [details]
nps snapshot
Comment 2 Milutin Kristofic 2011-12-07 13:40:31 UTC
It looks like after implementation of Redo after save - there is slowness in BaseDocument.insertString() 


Mila, can you please evaluate it?
Comment 3 Miloslav Metelka 2011-12-08 11:22:27 UTC
No, it's all about RP.SlowItem at various places. I thought SlowItem is turned off for beta releases but apparently not (it is off just for FCS).

http://hg.netbeans.org/jet-main/rev/955fa396c0ed
Comment 4 Quality Engineering 2011-12-10 12:05:46 UTC
Integrated into 'main-golden'
Changeset: http://hg.netbeans.org/main-golden/rev/955fa396c0ed
User: Miloslav Metelka <mmetelka@netbeans.org>
Log: #205905 - LowPerformance took 3s at BaseDocument.insertString()
Comment 5 Miloslav Metelka 2011-12-14 14:10:33 UTC
*** Bug 206286 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Miloslav Metelka 2011-12-14 14:16:25 UTC
*** Bug 206287 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Milutin Kristofic 2012-10-11 11:51:34 UTC
*** Bug 199430 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***