This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 199409 - AssertionError: null object for UID KeyBasedUID on NSKey OmneonPosix of project /home/toddb/src/src1/omneon/posix/includeL
Summary: AssertionError: null object for UID KeyBasedUID on NSKey OmneonPosix of proje...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 196228
Alias: None
Product: cnd
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code Model (show other bugs)
Version: 7.0
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: issues@cnd
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-06-14 19:53 UTC by tbrunhoff
Modified: 2011-08-10 14:55 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 179337


Attachments
stacktrace (3.12 KB, text/plain)
2011-06-14 19:53 UTC, tbrunhoff
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description tbrunhoff 2011-06-14 19:53:07 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 201106041000)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 19.0-b09, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_23-b05
OS: Linux

User Comments:
tbrunhoff: Starting the ide.




Stacktrace: 
java.lang.AssertionError: null object for UID KeyBasedUID on NSKey OmneonPosix of project /home/toddb/src/src1/omneon/posix/includeL
   at org.netbeans.modules.cnd.modelimpl.csm.NamespaceDefinitionImpl._getNamespaceImpl(NamespaceDefinitionImpl.java:253)
   at org.netbeans.modules.cnd.modelimpl.csm.NamespaceDefinitionImpl.getNamespace(NamespaceDefinitionImpl.java:185)
   at org.netbeans.modules.cnd.modelimpl.csm.resolver.Resolver3.processTypedefsInUpperNamespaces(Resolver3.java:510)
   at org.netbeans.modules.cnd.modelimpl.csm.resolver.Resolver3.gatherMaps(Resolver3.java:534)
   at org.netbeans.modules.cnd.modelimpl.csm.resolver.Resolver3.gatherMaps(Resolver3.java:453)
   at org.netbeans.modules.cnd.modelimpl.csm.resolver.Resolver3.gatherMaps(Resolver3.java:426)
Comment 1 tbrunhoff 2011-06-14 19:53:12 UTC
Created attachment 108895 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Alexander Pepin 2011-07-06 14:15:29 UTC
No QA action needed.
Comment 3 nnnnnk 2011-08-10 14:55:55 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 196228 ***