This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 19317 - DataObject editor: provide default handling
Summary: DataObject editor: provide default handling
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Property Editors (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jiri Rechtacek
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 19851
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2002-01-11 05:28 UTC by Rochelle Raccah
Modified: 2008-12-22 09:50 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rochelle Raccah 2002-01-11 05:28:44 UTC 
Please see the thread on nbdev:
<http://www.netbeans.org/servlets/ReadMsg?msgId=227344&listName=nbdev>
Comment 1 Jan Chalupa 2002-01-11 14:00:39 UTC 
Target milestone -> 3.4
Comment 2 Jan Chalupa 2002-01-11 14:05:02 UTC 
Target milestone -> 3.4
Comment 3 Jan Chalupa 2002-01-11 14:06:35 UTC 
Target milestone -> 3.4
Comment 4 Jan Chalupa 2002-01-11 14:10:15 UTC 
Target milestone -> 3.4
Comment 5 Marek Grummich 2002-07-22 08:35:11 UTC 
Target milestone was changed from '3.4' to TBD.
Comment 6 Marek Grummich 2002-07-22 08:50:19 UTC 
Target milestone was changed from '3.4' to TBD.
Comment 7 Marian Mirilovic 2002-12-06 17:09:38 UTC 
reassigne to Tim, new owner of property editors.
Comment 8 _ tboudreau 2002-12-11 02:36:44 UTC 
Rochelle, what is the status of this request?  From the thread on
nbdev, it sounds like there are some very specific requirements
(different behaviors for class nodes, etc.) that might not be 
appropriate for core, but some kind of pluggable filtration might
do the trick?

Also, it sounds like you have an implementation of what you want,
but you would like to eliminate it and just use the core editor.
Is there an impl of what you're after that you could attach?
Comment 9 Rochelle Raccah 2002-12-11 02:39:27 UTC 
Yes, I think some kind of support in the core would be best, though it
wouldn't exactly match my implementation.  The goal would be to
rewrite some of my code to use a core editor and provide this useful
functionality to others.  My code is in the closed source, so I can't
attach it, but I can probably work with you offline and provide you
with some more info.
Comment 10 _ tboudreau 2004-04-19 14:53:14 UTC 
Passing property editor issues to new owner, Jirka
Comment 11 Jiri Rechtacek 2008-10-16 15:42:31 UTC 
It's not planned for long time. It's fair to close as WONTFIX