This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 18619 - Test failure in java module
Summary: Test failure in java module
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 7058
Alias: None
Product: java
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Unsupported (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Svata Dedic
URL:
Keywords: TEST
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-12-13 14:04 UTC by Jesse Glick
Modified: 2007-09-26 09:14 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
Diff golden -> actual (827 bytes, patch)
2001-12-14 10:55 UTC, Jesse Glick
Details | Diff
Actual output file (1.11 KB, text/plain)
2001-12-14 10:56 UTC, Jesse Glick
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jesse Glick 2001-12-13 14:04:14 UTC
r33 dec 13 xtest failure: golden files differ.
Comment 1 Jan Becicka 2001-12-13 20:51:54 UTC
There are two possible reasons, why these tests fail:
1. There is a bug in the java module or in openide.src
2. There is a bug in the tests

I'm looking at results of old non-xtest tests, and they passed. So I 
suppose, that problem is in tests and accordingly I'm lowering 
priority to P3.

Jesse, can you attach .diff file of failed test? One representative 
is sufficient by then. Thanks
Comment 2 Jesse Glick 2001-12-14 10:54:03 UTC
There is only one failure, I will attach diff and complete file too.
The source file is clearly bogus.
Comment 3 Jesse Glick 2001-12-14 10:55:41 UTC
Created attachment 3822 [details]
Diff golden -> actual
Comment 4 Jesse Glick 2001-12-14 10:56:52 UTC
Created attachment 3823 [details]
Actual output file
Comment 5 Jan Becicka 2001-12-14 21:04:20 UTC
OK, it is clear now. I thought, that 13 xtests failed. :-)

Svata, please take a look at attached output file. Package name and 
class name was not substituted...
Comment 6 Jan Becicka 2001-12-18 14:28:14 UTC
This issue looks alike issue 7058.
Comment 7 Jan Becicka 2002-03-22 12:45:34 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 7058 ***
Comment 8 Quality Engineering 2003-07-01 13:11:09 UTC
Resolved for 3.4.x or earlier, no new info since then -> closing.
Comment 9 Quality Engineering 2003-07-01 13:19:12 UTC
Resolved for 3.4.x or earlier, no new info since then -> closing.